“Even by the standards of the Brighton rentals this agent ......”
1 Star Review
Nov 22,2017
By:
'Chris'
Nov 22,2017
Branch: Brighton, 109 Church Road
Services: Lettings (as a Tenant)
Rent PCM: £625
Would you recommend?: No
Postcode: BN1
Branch: Brighton, 109 Church Road
Lettings (as a Tenant)
Rent PCM: £625
Postcode: BN1
2
people found
this helpful
Even by the standards of the Brighton rentals this agent is extremely unpleasant to deal with. The property had damp issues from the beginning, with the wallpaper coming away from the walls when I moved into the flat (the 'redecoration' involved painting over the top of this). The damp issues worsened considerably over time, and while Property Moves responded to my emails absolutely nothing was done.
My neighbour managed to get some repairs done at the point his roof was on the verge of collapse and the carpets soaked throughout from water coming through, but between me reporting the issues to Property Moves and (thank god) leaving the property over 3 months later they did nothing in my flat. Even when running a dehumidifier 12 hours a day and airing the flat whenever I was there it was impossible to keep the flat in a condition that wasn't seriously concerned for my health, and they simply don't care. They even put up the rent around the same time. In the days before I left I noticed more damp coming through the hallway entering the flat, and by the time I had gone had an entire folder on my PC devoted to photos documenting just how utterly appalling they have been.
The really important part to consider before moving in to a property from these people: photograph and save absolutely everything in the property in detail before you move in. Upon leaving this dreadful situation I was then billed £80 for iron burns because they hadn't bothered to replace the carpet (to my probable shame I have never owned or used an iron in the flat) and £35 for cleaning. Possibly the condition was imperfect, but I consider the state of the property when I moved in - with mould growing in the toilet cistern and in the kitchen; what must have been at least a year of grime under the cupboards; an (my personal favourite) and ash tray full of fag ends on top of one of the cupboards - an absolute disgrace. I was in effect, billed for cleaning the landlord's flat for him.
If you really do have to rent from these people (and given the state of the Brighton property market you may have to) do everything you possibly can to protect yourself from them. Document everything, and email it to them with an explanation of why using a service that stores emails and photos indefinitely, you will this as evidence when it comes to the return of your deposit. We are in the situation of the estate agents competing for landlords, not for tenants. You are not their client: you are a bag of money, which they can extract and use to sell themselves to their clients. Be smarter than I was.
2
people found
this helpful
Was this helpful?
Yes
Reading through your email I would like to explain the experiences you have had from our point of view as agents. As agents we appreciate that we are your first point of reference and potentially the ones you would like to blame for any situations you may have found yourself not wanting to appear to alleviate ourselves from any responsibility but we are not the people that make the actual decisions in relation to maintenance, deposits etc throughout any term of any tenancy.
In relation to the leak from the property above in July 2017 and your comments "simply dont care" we feel this comment is unfair and unjustified. We did everything within our power at the time to get this issue rectified as the landlord was quite clear in communications that he would be dealing with the issue himself, this information was relayed to you on the day you reported the issue and we subsequently followed up on a number of occasions. With regards to maintenance we simply cannot spend anyones money without their authorisation to do so and as stated above the landlord wanted to deal with the issue himself.
I wanted to be in a position to answer all points of your review, however the management department cannot seem to locate any communications regarding the damp that you outlined in your review, if you would like to forward any communication you have to either myself or our Department Manager (Jill Brewster [email protected]) we would like to review this in more detail.
With regards to the deposit deductions, the checkout was carried out by a third party the next working day after you vacated and at this point the property condition was compared to the original inventory which I note was in fact amended by yourself at the beginning of the tenancy (All amendments made I note were accepted in writing). The final deductions that are made from the deposit will always ultimately be the decision of the landlord. It is never our intention to cause you unnecessary stress and our property managers can only influence this final outcome so much, please let me assure you we always seek a fair outcome that is based on all the evidence that has been provided by our independent property inspectors.
In relation to your deposit I note a deduction of £80.00 compensation for iron style burn marks to the carpet, as with all checkouts the independent property inspectors compare your amended inventory against the property when you vacate and found these to be an issue. I note your comment "I do not own, and have never used an iron in the property, these marks where present when I moved in". To clarify the check out report detailed "3 iron burn marks to the carpet leading to the kitchen section" within the inventory the description was: "Showing grey discolouration with grey spot marks throughout, showing multiple cigarette style burn marks throughout and debris, showing linear burn marks in front of fireplace section". As you will see from the two descriptions there were "cigarette style" burns to the carpet and also a "linear burn" in front of the fireplace but no mention of the 3 "iron burn" style burns to the carpet leading to the kitchen section. Reviewing the evidence within the inventory, check out report and dated photographic evidence this cannot be ignored, also you did not note these on your amended inventory if indeed they were already present.
Given this information and that the landlord chose to deduct a compensation deduction in comparison to replacing the carpet in which he could of but considering the condition of the carpet at the beginning of your tenancy this would of been considered to be unfair, there he chose to stick with the small in comparison compensation deduction of £80.00 - considering there were three burns this equals just over £25.00 per burn.
In relation to the cleaning noted a deduction was made following the independent checkout report when compared against your amended inventory. Although I appreciate this is difficult to accept the landlord should not be held responsible for cleaning of the property if left in this way, only the cleaning that is noted within the check out report is carried out nothing more or less.
If any tenant are unhappy with the final deposit decision they always have the option to raise a dispute with whoever the deposit is registered with, this is a free service and it was created for this very reason.
Thank you once again for taking the time to post a review, please accept my apologies that you feel let down this was never our intention and as always will take feedback seriously.