The UK's Largest Customer Review Website for the Property Industry
The UK's Largest Customer Review Website for the Property Industry

1/5, 5 Reviews
0% Recommended
100% letting valuation accuracy
67% letting fee satisfaction

Harinder
By : 'Disgraceful'
Services : Letting(Prospective Landlord/Tenant)
Would you recommend ? : No
Postcode : CR0
Very unprofessional lettings agent. They showed us round a property telling us it was a first come First served letting, we were the first to view the property and immediately rang and left a holding deposit of £300 to secure the place. We were then told by them the next day that they had taken three holding deposits and wanted everyone's best offer, they would then do the reference checks on all three parties and chose once cleared. As my husband was starting a new job our reference check was slowed as waiting for his contract to clear but after two weeks the credit check company Matas had received all their information and would have been able to complete the check. I had also confirmed with Harinder that we were able to provide guarantors if need be both for myself and my husband. It took them an extra week to then come back to us to say that another party had been chosen as our situation was getting complicated. Such an unprofessional dealing, we were told very clearly first come first served, they held into £900 worth of deposits for three weeks, and actually gave us false hope by suggesting we were the preferred tenants. I believe that as well as being seriously unprofessional they are also very devious as they were clearly holding onto the £900 in order to boost their sales figures as today is the 31st and the day they have given their decision after three and a half weeks of holding onto our money along with two other peoples money. Really really disgraceful agency.
Not lied in the first place and not held onto our money whilst leading us on.
| Services | Valuation | Fees | Min Price of property reviewed | Max Price of property reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Letting | 100% | 67.00% | £1,100 | £1,100 |
| From Landlords | From Tenants | From Vendors | From Buyers | From Other | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Gibbs
74-76 High Street, London, Greater London
SW19 2BY
020 8544 0800
By : 'Delores'
Branch : London, 74-76 High Street
Services : Letting (As a Owner)
Would you recommend ? : No
Postcode : CR4
Unhelpful, rude. Take your money but don't offer much of a service. Have to be chased to send out lettings contracts and when they finally get round to it contract not sent until after the date on the contract expires! Overall: ... Read Full Review
Bad.
By : 'Sloth'
Branch : London, 74-76 High Street
Services : Letting (As a Prospective Landlord/Tenant)
Would you recommend ? : No
Postcode : SW19
Absolutely horrible experience with these so called agents. Twice never showed up on an arranged appointment.When I called to ask the reason why, they insisted that they had already called me and spoke on the phone with me and we aggreed to view another flat and not this studio I was ... Read Full Review
By : 'Anahft'
Branch : London, 74-76 High Street
Services : Letting (As a Tenant)
Would you recommend ? : No
I am very disappointed with the treatment i was given by gibbs today. You had asked me to change the time for me to view the property at least 3 times and i was able to accomodate your request, however the last time you asked me to change the time i couldn't do later than15:55. I had understood i'd ... Read Full Review
By : 'tenant'
Branch : London, 74-76 High Street
Services : Letting (As a Tenant)
Rent PCM : £1100
Would you recommend ? : No
Postcode : SW17
An agent under the employment of this particular agency gave viewings to propective tenants without our permission nor a 24 hour written-notice. Upon confrontation, he failed to give an apology but what he offer was patronization and condescension. It seems they are very selective on whom they nice ... Read Full Review
They have responsibility to both landlords and tenants. However it seems they only care for those that will bring more business to them.

By : 'Disgraceful'
Branch : London, 74-76 High Street
Services : Letting (As a Prospective Landlord/Tenant)
Would you recommend ? : No
Postcode : CR0
Very unprofessional lettings agent. They showed us round a property telling us it was a first come First served letting, we were the first to view the property and immediately rang and left a holding deposit of £300 to secure the place. We were then told by them the next day that they had ... Read Full Review
Not lied in the first place and not held onto our money whilst leading us on.
Kindly note that legally, letting agents need to publish information about their tenancy fees, government-approved redress schemes and client money protection schemes on their website and on third party websites (on which agents are listed). For properties to lease/rent in England, agents need to keep this information up to date and precise on allAgents or specify within the property description.