property4peanuts

This client bought a bargain detached property in Atlanta, for a discounted price – just before the upswing in prices there over the past year or two. After tenants left, the property suffered vandalism. We admitted the refurbishment went slowly and compensated him. Then as a Title company didn’t do their job and there was a delay in registering the property (which we were unaware of), we paid to clear his taxes for the period and extra as a goodwill gesture. In total, he has received over $6,000 from us, which shows that we don’t abandon clients post sale. Despite this help, the client continues to press for money. As it seems he is unhappy with his property, we offered to help sell his property into what is now a good market in Atlanta, but he has not taken us up on the offer. In summary, this sale didn't go as smoothly as the vast majority of sales we handle as it was affected by poor service by those 3rd party providers that we rely on. But that’s very different from the tale presented by this client.

First of all you will notice that none of the questions have been answered. There were no tenants or proof that the refurbishment was completed. I have asked for the name of the title company and was told it was South East title, I contacted them and then denied dealing wit it. They have also conveniently glossed over the dates. The property was paid for in February 2010, the first indication I had of ownership was July 2012 which is 29 months after the date of purchase. This isn't a delay it is a disaster. The quit claim which is the lowest form of title was dated August 2011 and the year of 2012 had been crossed out. The client did not receive $6000 from them, that money was used to pay taxes which should have been settled at the time of purchase. In fact the city council sold off the debt to Riah capital management which increased the costs further. The total bill for taxes was $6036.56, Property4peanuts only paid $3858.54 as they deducted $1400 from the alleged rent payments. Can you believe that, it indicates the type of company that they are. The property has been vandalised substancially and this occured during the time it was owned by Oleksandr Abramovych, the mysterious person who is known to Property4peanuts. The property is not in a sellable state therefore the offer to sell is meaningless. They need to answer specific questions which I know from experience they will not. Q1. Who is Oleksandr Abramovych, he was the seller on the contract. Q2. What is the role of Oleksandr Abramovych in the property4peanuts company. Q3. The My money was paid to the Foreign Property SHop.Com company number 06027122 yet Abramovich was the seller. Did they transfer my money to Abramovych. Q4. Why didn't Abramovich have the property managed as he was the owner. He was the owner during the alleged tenancy and subsequently when the property was vandalised. Q5. There is no doubt who owned the property as the title records are in the public domain, and so called property specialists would know this and could check for themselves. Q6. Why did it take 29 months for the first notification of ownership. Q7. The date on the quit claim is 12th August 2011, which had been crossed out from 2012. If that date is to be believed then where was the quit claim from August 2011 to July 2012. Q8. Why weren't the taxes paid at the time of purchase, the contract stated that it would be free of liens. Q9. Provide proof that the propery was refurbished. he was told that the tenant moved in so quick that there wasn't time to take photos. If the tenant was so keen to move in why did they disappear without trace after two months. Q10. They claim the property was tenanted. However. at the time of the alleged tenancy the property did not belong to me it belonged to Abramovych. So in fact there are in breach of contract as it was supposed to be tenanted when he bought it. Furthermore he paid them $1400 towards the taxes otherwise they would not have paid them. Q11 They blame the title problems or third parties and not themselves. he paid $1100 for the legal aspects of the sale, it was the responsibility of Property4peanuts to ensure that third parties did their job. He continually told them of the title problems and they said it takes time. He phoned the court house that deals with it and they said it takes two weeks. Property4peanuts were totally responsible for the delays yet they try to pass on the blame to others. Q12. What was the name of the title company who were allegedly responsible You will see from the reply by Caroline that they are never specific when it comes to dates or naming those responsible. All the important items are glossed over. If they are as innocent aS they claim then I challenge them to answer the above questions. I Guarantee that they will not, it isn't in their nature. He can back up all statements with proof, much of which is in the public domain and indisputable. Three years after purchasing the house from Property4peauts he has lost lots of money, and has a house that has been vandalised and taxes still have to be paid. I would not want anybody to suffer the experience that I have had by buying a house through property4peanuts.

First of all you will notice that none of the questions have been answered. There were no tenants or proof that the refurbishment was completed. I have asked for the name of the title company and was told it was South East title, I contacted them and then denied dealing wit it. They have also conveniently glossed over the dates. The property was paid for in February 2010, the first indication I had of ownership was July 2012 which is 29 months after the date of purchase. This isn't a delay it is a disaster. The quit claim which is the lowest form of title was dated August 2011 and the year of 2012 had been crossed out. The client did not receive $6000 from them, that money was used to pay taxes which should have been settled at the time of purchase. In fact the city council sold off the debt to Riah capital management which increased the costs further. The total bill for taxes was $6036.56, Property4peanuts only paid $3858.54 as they deducted $1400 from the alleged rent payments. Can you believe that, it indicates the type of company that they are. The property has been vandalised substancially and this occured during the time it was owned by Oleksandr Abramovych, the mysterious person who is known to Property4peanuts. The property is not in a sellable state therefore the offer to sell is meaningless. They need to answer specific questions which I know from experience they will not. Q1. Who is Oleksandr Abramovych, he was the seller on the contract. Q2. What is the role of Oleksandr Abramovych in the property4peanuts company. Q3. The My money was paid to the Foreign Property SHop.Com company number 06027122 yet Abramovich was the seller. Did they transfer my money to Abramovych. Q4. Why didn't Abramovich have the property managed as he was the owner. He was the owner during the alleged tenancy and subsequently when the property was vandalised. Q5. There is no doubt who owned the property as the title records are in the public domain, and so called property specialists would know this and could check for themselves. Q6. Why did it take 29 months for the first notification of ownership. Q7. The date on the quit claim is 12th August 2011, which had been crossed out from 2012. If that date is to be believed then where was the quit claim from August 2011 to July 2012. Q8. Why weren't the taxes paid at the time of purchase, the contract stated that it would be free of liens. Q9. Provide proof that the propery was refurbished. he was told that the tenant moved in so quick that there wasn't time to take photos. If the tenant was so keen to move in why did they disappear without trace after two months. Q10. They claim the property was tenanted. However. at the time of the alleged tenancy the property did not belong to me it belonged to Abramovych. So in fact there are in breach of contract as it was supposed to be tenanted when he bought it. Furthermore he paid them $1400 towards the taxes otherwise they would not have paid them. Q11 They blame the title problems or third parties and not themselves. he paid $1100 for the legal aspects of the sale, it was the responsibility of Property4peanuts to ensure that third parties did their job. He continually told them of the title problems and they said it takes time. He phoned the court house that deals with it and they said it takes two weeks. Property4peanuts were totally responsible for the delays yet they try to pass on the blame to others. Q12. What was the name of the title company who were allegedly responsible You will see from the reply by Caroline that they are never specific when it comes to dates or naming those responsible. All the important items are glossed over. If they are as innocent aS they claim then I challenge them to answer the above questions. I Guarantee that they will not, it isn't in their nature. He can back up all statements with proof, much of which is in the public domain and indisputable. Three years after purchasing the house from Property4peauts he has lost lots of money, and has a house that has been vandalised and taxes still have to be paid. I would not want anybody to suffer the experience that I have had by buying a house through property4peanuts.